Logo
Menu
  • Home
  • Practice Areas
    • Medical Malpractice LawHelping New York Medical Malpractice, Personal Injury Cases
    • Close
  • New York Injury News
  • Press release
    • Injury News
    • Motor Vehicle Accidents
    • Personal Injury Accidents
    • Construction Accidents
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Premises Liability
    • Product Liability
    • Work Related Fire Fighter Deaths
    • Wrongful Death
    • Close
  • Ask A Lawyer
  • Free Case Evaluation
  • Sitemap

Home » Injury News » Recorded on the Sly: When a Customer Call Becomes an Invasion of Privacy

Recorded on the Sly: When a Customer Call Becomes an Invasion of Privacy

New Source: JusticeNewsFlash.com
01/13/2013 // San Francisco, CA, USA // Keller Grover LLP // Carey Been // (press release)

By now, it is a familiar scenario: A call to a customer support, order, or reservations line is made and a voice announces that the call may be recorded. The idea is simple: Alert the caller that if they continue the conversation, their words — and the potentially sensitive information they may divulge — won’t simply disappear into the ether. A thoughtful gesture? Sure. But in California, it is also the law, reports Bay Area consumer protection lawyer Carey Been.

Unfortunately, it is a law that isn’t always followed. The result is a worrisome loss of privacy for many consumers, with calls recorded without the required notice or permission. The good news is that the same California statute that mandates notice and consent for call recording also provides for penalties against those who stray from the law. It’s the legislature’s way of watching the back of California consumers, and helping to compensate them when their privacy is wrongfully placed in jeopardy.

The California law firm of Keller Grover — based in Los Angeles and San Francisco — has been on the forefront of ensuring that the goals and protections of the California law are put into action, and that those who have had their conversations improperly recorded see redress. The firm is currently handling a series of cases involving California’s Invasion of Privacy Act — which not only prohibits the recording of confidential telephone conversations without the consent of all parties to the communication, but provides for statutory damages in the amount of $5,000 per consumer, per unauthorized recording. Each of these cases is a class action lawsuit, in which a lead plaintiff represents a larger class of similarly situated plaintiffs, all of whom claim to have seen their privacy infringed by a defendant’s failure to conform with the California law.

Among the consumer protection cases Keller Grover is currently handling is a class action suit against the ticket reseller StubHub, Inc. Filed in January 2012 in the Superior Court of the State of California in San Francisco, plaintiff alleges in his complaint that recordings were made — without notice or permission — when consumers called StubHub’s telephone customer service number to inquire about, or seek help with, ticket purchases.

In a second case pursued by Keller Grover — this one filed in Orange County — plaintiffs allege in their complaint that Hyundai Motor America also violated California’s Invasion of Privacy Act by recording telephone conversations between consumers and Hyundai’s consumer affairs department without providing notice to consumers of such practice and without seeking, and obtaining, consent.

The cases are significant, Keller Grover consumer protection lawyers say, because they represent worrisome examples of companies disregarding privacy provisions put in place to protect consumers. Laws like the California Invasion of Privacy Act were enacted to give citizens a reasonable expectation that their privacy is being maintained — and that they have control over whether personal matters and information are to be recorded. By not following the law’s provisions, the defendants in these and similar cases aren’t just breaking the law, but breaking the trust that is so vital if consumers are to safely navigate the expanding modes of interaction and communications with the businesses they rely on.

In all of the cases Keller Grover is pursuing, the firm is asking the courts to award each plaintiff with the full amount of statutory damages: $5,000. This is the amount that the California legislature itself deemed warranted when it enacted the privacy law.

The cases, however, don’t end with the plaintiffs who are already part of each suit. Indeed, similarly affected consumers who feel that they were subject to the same surreptitious and secret recording while speaking with a customer support line or other type of call center, can also seek redress — and right a wrong that never should have happened. If you have information about these lawsuits or feel you may be entitled to damages in these cases, or from another company that may have recorded calls without consent, contact the class action lawyers of Keller Grover toll free at 415.659.9937 or fill out an information form at:

Home

Laws are about protection but they also about accountability. When improper behavior leads to consequences that never should have resulted — like the loss of one’s reasonably expected privacy — action can be taken. And as these telephone recording cases show, it is taken, for everyone who is impacted.

Media Information:

Address: 1965 Market Street, San Francisco, CA 94103
Phone: 415.659.9937
Url: San Francisco employment lawyer | Los Angeles employment attorney News Source: JusticeNewsFlash.com – Press Release Distribution

It's only fair to share...Pin on Pinterest
Pinterest
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email
Print this page
Print
January 15, 2013   injurynewsreporter
Injury News
×

  • 70 Injured in NY Ferry Accident
  • NJ Ferry Strikes Pier In NY, Scores Injured

Recent News and Press Coverage

  • Todd Stager, Esteemed SEO for Lawyers Expert, Embarks on a New Journey with His Own SEO Firm March 11, 2024
  • Attorney Dan Powell Examines the Financial Challenges of Not Having a Living Trust: Implications for Business Owners February 16, 2024
  • Adam P. Boyd Leads Innovative Masterclass on Strategies for Law Firm Growth February 14, 2024
  • David Dardashti Donates to Expand Research on Sexual Violence Among Children and Develop Prevention Protocol. January 29, 2024
  • A Queens County Supreme Court jury rendered a verdict for $7 million In Medical Negligence Case December 1, 2023
  • Record-Breaking $700,000 Verdict by Mezrano Law Firm Redefines Justice in Personal Injury Cases November 30, 2023
  • The Law Office of Richard Roman Shum Unveils Comprehensive Guide on New York Divorce Laws October 12, 2023
  • Brooklyn Estate Planning Attorney Yana Feldman Offers Free Services for Israel-bound Volunteers October 12, 2023
  • Google Drops FAQ Rich Snippets so Custom Legal Marketing Released a Video to Help Lawyers Understand Why October 5, 2023
  • Bronx Injury Attorneys Explain How Damages Are Calculated August 22, 2023
  • ZeroRisk Cases, Inc. Utilizes Cutting-Edge Technology to Target High-Quality Plaintiffs in Talcum Powder Litigation August 15, 2023
  • ZeroRisk Cases, Inc. Unveils Advanced Website Platform and Digital Marketing Strategy for Increased Law Firm Growth August 15, 2023
  • The Search Engine Domination Society Achieves a 300% Increase in Client Calls for NYC Personal Injury Lawyer August 11, 2023
  • Federal Tax Credits ERC Updates and Releases New Informational Videos about ERC July 6, 2023
  • Who is Liable for Dooring Accidents? Bronx E-bike Attorney Glenn A. Herman Explains July 4, 2023
  • Weizhen Tang Announces Publication of Law and Justice: My Struggle During His 2026 Mayoral Campaign July 4, 2023
  • Enhancing Data Compliance with AdvisorVault: Heritage Brokerage’s 17a-4 Trusted Partner July 3, 2023
  • Attorney Beau Harlan: The Champion of Justice Unveils Comprehensive Legal Services for Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR June 28, 2023
  • The Legal Process for Motor Vehicle Accidents in New York City June 2, 2023
  • NYC Bicycle Accident Lawyer Explains Winning an Accident Claim March 20, 2023

Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • July 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • December 1999
  • January 1970
New York Injury News
1512 Schorr Place
PMB #35071
Bronx, NY 10469
718-210-1007
Copyright © 2025 New York Injury News
Go to mobile version