Logo
Menu
  • Home
  • Practice Areas
    • Medical Malpractice LawHelping New York Medical Malpractice, Personal Injury Cases
    • Close
  • New York Injury News
  • Press release
    • Injury News
    • Motor Vehicle Accidents
    • Personal Injury Accidents
    • Construction Accidents
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Premises Liability
    • Product Liability
    • Work Related Fire Fighter Deaths
    • Wrongful Death
    • Close
  • Ask A Lawyer
  • Free Case Evaluation
  • Sitemap

Home » Injury News » Jailed U.S. Congressional Candidate Charges Prosecutorial Misconduct

Jailed U.S. Congressional Candidate Charges Prosecutorial Misconduct

New Source: JusticeNewsFlash.com
10/15/2012 (press release: mdignam) // Diamondhead , MS, USA // Michael Dignam

Long standing Conservative hero and Nationally recognized Mormon Female Leader who worked directly with the President of the Mormon Church to organize all the LDS Stakes across the country to fight the Equal Rights Amendment, Abortion and later the Lottery was Jailed on April 3 rd., 2012 for 70 mo. for a $4,500. first offense with no bail and no parole. Gail Dignam, denied bail, now awaits in prison the upcoming oral argument on her recently filed appeal at the Federal 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, New Orleans, Louisiana.

Gail Dignam was the lone Republican Whistle-Blower who authored legislation as an elected Republican Louisiana State official to investigate ACORN in Louisiana, and its US Senate backers Barack Obama and Barney Frank, for Voter Fraud in 2008. Although the State of Louisiana declined to prosecute Gail Dignam after a multi-year investigation, her failed Congressional Party opponent at that time seeking re-election to U.S. Congress, Donald Cazayoux, (after being appointed as U.S. Attorney by President Barack Obama) did elect to prosecute Gail Dignam for a $9,000. Indictment of secretly directing $9,000. to her son from the $7,000,000. she administered for the State of Louisiana and the Federal Government.

The eventual conviction of secretly directing $4,500. to her son from the $7,000,000. Federal and state funds (no fine) was as described in the indictment based on the testimony the lone material witness Don Peterson that he did not know Gail’s son was receiving the funds and that he did not authorize her to sign his name in order to expedite his being paid while being treated in hospitals for Parkinson’s Disease and his intermittent cancer treatments and operations.

Germaine to Gail Dignam’s charge of Prosecutorial Misconduct is that this lone material witness against Gail Dignam was seen by a well respected attorney to have signed the Notarized Affidavit three months before trial on the basis that he was going to “clear his conscience” and in the words of that attorney “If the government said he did not mean to complete the affidavit then there must be Prosecutorial Misconduct on the part of the Government”. (a policy that was approved standard procedure in the GPA office Gail Dignam inherited after the previous director was fired.)

Gail Dignam was not allowed to present this “clear the conscience” affidavit at trial nor talk about the possibility that selective political prosecution may have occurred and more egregiously she is adamant that the Government should not have been allowed to seize all her investigator’s and her legal defense strategies and computers and recordings on the basis that he and other witnesses had been coerced. At trial all were asked if they were coerced and all said no.

Critically, when Gail Dignam asked the issuing Federal Magistrate Judge in Mississippi for a copy of the signed affidavit used to seize her confidential attorney client and investigator records, he replied “The Assistant U.S. Attorney in Baton Rouge, Middle District Federal Court has sealed the record and as a result the signed affidavit would not be provided to the defense.” There are no National Security issues involved in Gail Dignam’s case and she feels the copy of the signed affidavit should have been given to her as the materials taken in the seizure were effectively used to usurp her constitutional rights.

Additionally, Gail Dignam’s defense is concerned that a cover-up exists (in many areas) and that her Constitutional rights as a whistle-blower, a Candidate for U.S. Congress, a U.S. Citizen and her right to Due Process were all violated. Gail Dignam can only hope that in her upcoming appeal recently filed in the 5th Circuit Federal Appeals Court in New Orleans, Louisiana, that the light of day will shine on her case to vindicate her long standing never tarnished reputation and to free her from prison.

The Office of Professional Responsibility declined to investigate the issues at hand till her appeal is complete, however Gail now still sits in Federal Prison, without bail or parole opportunities and her appeal may take up to 18 months before it is heard.

Her own story is told on her website at http://GailDignamForCongress.com .

Gail Dignam Authors Legislation as Elected Official to Expose Voter Fraud.

Gail Dignam Bravely is the Whistle-Blower on potential $2,000,000. Federal & State Finance Fraud.

http://GailDignam.com

http://GailDignamForCongress.com

Social Media Tags:Prosecutorial Misconduct, Whistle-Blower, law

Newsroom powered by Online Press Release Distribution – SubmitMyPressRelease.com News Source: JusticeNewsFlash.com – Press Release Distribution

It's only fair to share...Pin on Pinterest
Pinterest
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email
Print this page
Print
October 18, 2012   injurynewsreporter
Injury News
×

  • Queens Hit-and-Run Accident Kills Bicyclist
  • Central Calif. Hospital to Pay $975K in Filipino Nurse Discrimination Lawsuit

Recent News and Press Coverage

  • Todd Stager, Esteemed SEO for Lawyers Expert, Embarks on a New Journey with His Own SEO Firm March 11, 2024
  • Attorney Dan Powell Examines the Financial Challenges of Not Having a Living Trust: Implications for Business Owners February 16, 2024
  • Adam P. Boyd Leads Innovative Masterclass on Strategies for Law Firm Growth February 14, 2024
  • David Dardashti Donates to Expand Research on Sexual Violence Among Children and Develop Prevention Protocol. January 29, 2024
  • A Queens County Supreme Court jury rendered a verdict for $7 million In Medical Negligence Case December 1, 2023
  • Record-Breaking $700,000 Verdict by Mezrano Law Firm Redefines Justice in Personal Injury Cases November 30, 2023
  • The Law Office of Richard Roman Shum Unveils Comprehensive Guide on New York Divorce Laws October 12, 2023
  • Brooklyn Estate Planning Attorney Yana Feldman Offers Free Services for Israel-bound Volunteers October 12, 2023
  • Google Drops FAQ Rich Snippets so Custom Legal Marketing Released a Video to Help Lawyers Understand Why October 5, 2023
  • Bronx Injury Attorneys Explain How Damages Are Calculated August 22, 2023
  • ZeroRisk Cases, Inc. Utilizes Cutting-Edge Technology to Target High-Quality Plaintiffs in Talcum Powder Litigation August 15, 2023
  • ZeroRisk Cases, Inc. Unveils Advanced Website Platform and Digital Marketing Strategy for Increased Law Firm Growth August 15, 2023
  • The Search Engine Domination Society Achieves a 300% Increase in Client Calls for NYC Personal Injury Lawyer August 11, 2023
  • Federal Tax Credits ERC Updates and Releases New Informational Videos about ERC July 6, 2023
  • Who is Liable for Dooring Accidents? Bronx E-bike Attorney Glenn A. Herman Explains July 4, 2023
  • Weizhen Tang Announces Publication of Law and Justice: My Struggle During His 2026 Mayoral Campaign July 4, 2023
  • Enhancing Data Compliance with AdvisorVault: Heritage Brokerage’s 17a-4 Trusted Partner July 3, 2023
  • Attorney Beau Harlan: The Champion of Justice Unveils Comprehensive Legal Services for Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR June 28, 2023
  • The Legal Process for Motor Vehicle Accidents in New York City June 2, 2023
  • NYC Bicycle Accident Lawyer Explains Winning an Accident Claim March 20, 2023

Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • July 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • December 1999
  • January 1970
New York Injury News
1512 Schorr Place
PMB #35071
Bronx, NY 10469
718-210-1007
Copyright © 2025 New York Injury News
Go to mobile version