Logo
Menu
  • Home
  • Practice Areas
    • Medical Malpractice LawHelping New York Medical Malpractice, Personal Injury Cases
    • Close
  • New York Injury News
  • Press release
    • Injury News
    • Motor Vehicle Accidents
    • Personal Injury Accidents
    • Construction Accidents
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Premises Liability
    • Product Liability
    • Work Related Fire Fighter Deaths
    • Wrongful Death
    • Close
  • Ask A Lawyer
  • Free Case Evaluation
  • Sitemap

Home » Injury News » Greg Vigna, MD, JD: Spinal Cord Injury Pain Requires Individualized Therapy

Greg Vigna, MD, JD: Spinal Cord Injury Pain Requires Individualized Therapy

New Source: JusticeNewsFlash.com
03/28/2013 // Concord, CA, USA // LifeCare123 // Greg A. Vigna M.D., J.D. // (press release)

Medical Perspective of Life Care Solutions Group:

Chronic pain in a spinal cord injury is very common, occurring in nearly 2 out of every three patients. In a majority of these patients, they are classified as severe. This is devastating to a patient faced with the physical, mental, social, and vocational loss following a spinal cord injury. Management of chronic pain in a spinal cord injured patient requires a knowledgeable physician who is well versed in spinal cord injury pain and who can implement a multidisciplinary approach to the patient’s treatment, which may include neurosurgery procedures, anesthesia injections, implantable pain devices, physical therapy, psychologic services, and pharmacologic management.

Spinal cord injured patients with pain at the location of the injury may be related to an inadequate fusion, torn soft tissues including muscles, tendons, ligaments, and joints (facets) above or below the level of the fusion. Often the patient’s symptoms will be worse with activity. The pain is often at or near the spine, and is often described as “aching” type of pain. Proper medical evaluation should rule out inadequate fusion. A trial of physical therapy should include modalities such as heat, ultrasound, electrical stimulation, and active exercises. Medication management may include anti-inflammatory medication, muscle relaxers, and narcotic pain medicines. Patients with continued pain should be evaluated for therapeutic injections by either a physiatrist or a pain management physician. Therapeutic injections may include Botox, trigger point injections, and facet injections. Based upon my training, education and treating many different spine injured patients, it is my opinion that chronic mechanical related pain is more common and is often overlooked and treated as central pain syndrome with chronic high dose narcotics, which unfortunately, may have significant long term detrimental effects on a spinal cord patient.

Spinal cord injured patients with pain at the level of injury may be radicular (e.g. pain that radiates down a limb), that is from the direct compression of the nerves as they leave the spine by fracture fragments, herniated discs, or scar tissue following surgical procedures. Patients will often complain of pain referred in a distribution directly related to the level of injury. Patients require evaluation of ongoing compression of the nerves by way of imaging studies, and diagnostic injections directly on the compressed nerve. Treatments may include medication management, surgical decompression, implantable devices, and therapeutic injections. Medications include anti-inflammatories, seizure and antidepressant medications used in pain management, and narcotic medications. Based upon my training, education and after treating many different spine injured patients, it is my opinion that spinal cord injured patients radicular pain will often be overlooked and treated as a central pain syndrome with high dose narcotics and it has been my experience that patients have had significant improvement following decompression after many years of pain that was originally blamed on central pain syndrome. It my opinion that spinal cord stimulators are very effective in appropriate patients and allow for improved function and decreased medications when utilized.

Based upon my training, education and after treating hundreds of spinal cord injured patients, it is my opinion that central pain following a spinal cord injury is the most debilitating pain syndrome in spinal cord injured patients. These injuries are the most poorly understood, and are they are commonly inadequately treated. Central pain symptoms are described as lancing, stabbing, and aching below the level of the lesion, and they are not in any particular order or nerve distribution. Patients with central pain following spinal cord injury require individualized therapies and multiple types of treatments to help control the pain. High dose narcotic pain medicines have been proven to benefit these patients. Patients need to be closely monitored for maximum therapeutic benefit as well as for patient compliance. I believe that patients must be screened by a psychologist trained in pain management to learn coping mechanisms, biofeedback techniques to decrease pain, and to follow depressive issues going forward. I also believe that patient compliance regarding a pain management contract is essential and must be followed long term to monitor these medications; failure to do so is the most likely reason for long-term failure of this treatment option. Multiple medications used together including antidepressants, anti-seizure, and muscle relaxers used together may add to the therapeutic effect of narcotic pain medications.

Life Care Planner Perspective:

A life care planner must consider all future care necessary and appropriate that is related to a spinal cord injury. That would include chronic spinal cord related pain. A life care planner must know all options, including physical therapy, exercise equipment, injection therapy, implantable devices, medications, laboratory tests, imaging studies, psychological services, physician needs, as well as the potential need for inpatient chronic pain management in the future. A failure to provide for this will lead to patient complications such as depression, self-neglect, pressure ulcers, maladapted behaviors, and poor functional outcomes.

Lawyer Perspective:

A competent serious injury lawyer must prove to the jury all future medical costs that are directly related to the spinal cord injury. Future management of chronic pain related to a spinal cord injury over the projected lifetime of the injured patient is typically a significant amount. A catastrophically injured client will need an outcome that will fairly compensate him for his future medical needs, and often times, the biggest challenge is finding enough insurance coverage or deep pockets that can adequately satisfy a significant damages award. Also, pain and suffering would be a large component of an award. Future planned treatment of a patient’s pain, as well as testimony by the patient, family members, friends and loved ones are the types of evidence that a jury would consider when awarding a significant pain and suffering award.

Media Information:

Address: 1401 Willow Pass Road, Concord, CA 94520
Phone: 888.990.9410
Url: Lifecare Solutions Group News Source: JusticeNewsFlash.com – Press Release Distribution

It's only fair to share...Pin on Pinterest
Pinterest
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email
Print this page
Print
March 30, 2013   injurynewsreporter
Injury News
×

  • What if I’ve Suffered Hearing Loss from Noise Exposure at a Construction Site?
  • Greg Vigna, MD, JD: Sexual Function In The Male Spinal Cord Patient

Recent News and Press Coverage

  • Todd Stager, Esteemed SEO for Lawyers Expert, Embarks on a New Journey with His Own SEO Firm March 11, 2024
  • Attorney Dan Powell Examines the Financial Challenges of Not Having a Living Trust: Implications for Business Owners February 16, 2024
  • Adam P. Boyd Leads Innovative Masterclass on Strategies for Law Firm Growth February 14, 2024
  • David Dardashti Donates to Expand Research on Sexual Violence Among Children and Develop Prevention Protocol. January 29, 2024
  • A Queens County Supreme Court jury rendered a verdict for $7 million In Medical Negligence Case December 1, 2023
  • Record-Breaking $700,000 Verdict by Mezrano Law Firm Redefines Justice in Personal Injury Cases November 30, 2023
  • The Law Office of Richard Roman Shum Unveils Comprehensive Guide on New York Divorce Laws October 12, 2023
  • Brooklyn Estate Planning Attorney Yana Feldman Offers Free Services for Israel-bound Volunteers October 12, 2023
  • Google Drops FAQ Rich Snippets so Custom Legal Marketing Released a Video to Help Lawyers Understand Why October 5, 2023
  • Bronx Injury Attorneys Explain How Damages Are Calculated August 22, 2023
  • ZeroRisk Cases, Inc. Utilizes Cutting-Edge Technology to Target High-Quality Plaintiffs in Talcum Powder Litigation August 15, 2023
  • ZeroRisk Cases, Inc. Unveils Advanced Website Platform and Digital Marketing Strategy for Increased Law Firm Growth August 15, 2023
  • The Search Engine Domination Society Achieves a 300% Increase in Client Calls for NYC Personal Injury Lawyer August 11, 2023
  • Federal Tax Credits ERC Updates and Releases New Informational Videos about ERC July 6, 2023
  • Who is Liable for Dooring Accidents? Bronx E-bike Attorney Glenn A. Herman Explains July 4, 2023
  • Weizhen Tang Announces Publication of Law and Justice: My Struggle During His 2026 Mayoral Campaign July 4, 2023
  • Enhancing Data Compliance with AdvisorVault: Heritage Brokerage’s 17a-4 Trusted Partner July 3, 2023
  • Attorney Beau Harlan: The Champion of Justice Unveils Comprehensive Legal Services for Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR June 28, 2023
  • The Legal Process for Motor Vehicle Accidents in New York City June 2, 2023
  • NYC Bicycle Accident Lawyer Explains Winning an Accident Claim March 20, 2023

Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • July 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • December 1999
  • January 1970
New York Injury News
1512 Schorr Place
PMB #35071
Bronx, NY 10469
718-210-1007
Copyright © 2025 New York Injury News
Go to mobile version