Logo
Menu
  • Home
  • Practice Areas
    • Medical Malpractice LawHelping New York Medical Malpractice, Personal Injury Cases
    • Close
  • New York Injury News
  • Press release
    • Injury News
    • Motor Vehicle Accidents
    • Personal Injury Accidents
    • Construction Accidents
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Premises Liability
    • Product Liability
    • Work Related Fire Fighter Deaths
    • Wrongful Death
    • Close
  • Ask A Lawyer
  • Free Case Evaluation
  • Sitemap

Home » Injury News » Dallas Pradaxa Lawyer Reports Consolidation of Product Liability Litigation

Dallas Pradaxa Lawyer Reports Consolidation of Product Liability Litigation

New Source: JusticeNewsFlash.com
08/08/2012 (press release: kayvanwey) // Ms. Van Wey

On August 8, 2012, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation issued an order consolidating all pending and future Pradaxa cases in multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the Southern District of Illinois under the supervision of Judge David R. Herndon.

The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) issued a Transfer Order centralizing Pradaxa product liability litigation in the Southern District of Illinois. The Pradaxa MDL, entitled In Re: Pradaxa Product Liability Litigation currently consists of 21 lawsuits pending in 11 federal jurisdictions throughout the United States. The Transfer Order, signed by John G. Heyburn, II, Chairman of the Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, stated that Pradaxa actions involve common issues and questions of fact. The JPML opined that centralizing the cases in the Southern District of Illinois will serve the convenience of all parties.

The JPML noted in its Transfer Order that all Pradaxa cases share common factual questions arising from allegations that plaintiffs suffered severe bleeding or other serious injuries caused by Pradaxa. The JPML felt that the consolidation of Pradaxa cases will eliminate duplicative discovery, prevent inconsistent pretrial rulings and conserve the resources of the parties and the court system. The JPML selected Judge Herndon to preside over the MDL proceedings based on his vast experience as an MDL judge. Judge Herndon has presided over the Yasmin and Yaz product liability litigation, which is one of the largest pharmaceutical products liability actions in the United States.

A motion for consolidation was filed on May 30, 2012 requesting that a Pradaxa Product Liability MDL be established to consolidate Pradaxa lawsuits. The motion for consolidation was based on common allegations against Pradaxa’s manufacturer, Boehringer Ingelheim, contained in cases currently pending in federal jurisdictions the United States.

Pradaxa Internal Bleeding

The complaints that have already been filed allege the following:

• Pradaxa causes uncontrolled and excessive bleeding.

• Boehringer Ingelheim failed to warn healthcare professionals that there is no effective reversal agent to counteract the anticoagulant effects of Pradaxa.

• The lack of a reversal agent has caused life-threatening conditions, permanent disability, and deaths.

• In its advertising campaigns, Boehringer Ingelheim exaggerated the effectiveness of Pradaxa with respect to preventing stroke and blood clots.

• Boehringer Ingelheim failed to properly research Pradaxa before seeking FDA approval of the drug.

• Boehringer Ingelheim failed to warn consumers about the risk of severe bleeding events associated with the drug.

Pradaxa attorney, Kay Van Wey, explains that the MDL procedure was established to streamline the legal process for ease in handling complex legal issues. The consolidation of personal injury or product liability lawsuits as part of an MDL is common in complex pharmaceutical litigation involving a large number of lawsuits with similar facts and allegations. Cases are consolidated into an MDL for purposes of case management and discovery. After pretrial proceedings and discovery has been completed, cases may be returned to the original court for trial.

Ms. Van Wey also reports that the pending litigation alleges that Boehringer Ingelheim failed to warn healthcare professionals and consumers of the serious complications associated with the drug. The plaintiffs allege that the use of Pradaxa caused massive bleeding and deaths. Actions against Boehringer Ingelheim include claims for negligence, product liability, design defects, and fraudulent concealment.

If you have suffered from Pradaxa internal bleeding or complications caused by Pradaxa, you may be entitled to compensation. Dallas Pradaxa injury attorney Kay Van Wey is currently representing patients who have been harmed by Pradaxa and their families. Ms. Van Wey is conducting confidential case evaluations and will speak with you personally regarding your potential Pradaxa injury claim. For more information, call Van Wey Law at (800) 489-5082.

Ms. Van Wey’s upcoming FREE eBook, entitled “The Truth about Pradaxa” will soon be available on her website http://www.vanweylaw.com.

Social Media Tags:pradaxa attorney, internal bleeding, pradaxa lawsuit

Newsroom powered by Online Press Release Distribution – SubmitMyPressRelease.com News Source: JusticeNewsFlash.com – Press Release Distribution

It's only fair to share...Pin on Pinterest
Pinterest
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email
Print this page
Print
August 16, 2012   injurynewsreporter
Injury News
×

  • Texas Divorce Forms Video Officially Released by Online Divorce Forms Website
  • Off-duty officer kills man after running into child in motorcycle accident

Recent News and Press Coverage

  • Todd Stager, Esteemed SEO for Lawyers Expert, Embarks on a New Journey with His Own SEO Firm March 11, 2024
  • Attorney Dan Powell Examines the Financial Challenges of Not Having a Living Trust: Implications for Business Owners February 16, 2024
  • Adam P. Boyd Leads Innovative Masterclass on Strategies for Law Firm Growth February 14, 2024
  • David Dardashti Donates to Expand Research on Sexual Violence Among Children and Develop Prevention Protocol. January 29, 2024
  • A Queens County Supreme Court jury rendered a verdict for $7 million In Medical Negligence Case December 1, 2023
  • Record-Breaking $700,000 Verdict by Mezrano Law Firm Redefines Justice in Personal Injury Cases November 30, 2023
  • The Law Office of Richard Roman Shum Unveils Comprehensive Guide on New York Divorce Laws October 12, 2023
  • Brooklyn Estate Planning Attorney Yana Feldman Offers Free Services for Israel-bound Volunteers October 12, 2023
  • Google Drops FAQ Rich Snippets so Custom Legal Marketing Released a Video to Help Lawyers Understand Why October 5, 2023
  • Bronx Injury Attorneys Explain How Damages Are Calculated August 22, 2023
  • ZeroRisk Cases, Inc. Utilizes Cutting-Edge Technology to Target High-Quality Plaintiffs in Talcum Powder Litigation August 15, 2023
  • ZeroRisk Cases, Inc. Unveils Advanced Website Platform and Digital Marketing Strategy for Increased Law Firm Growth August 15, 2023
  • The Search Engine Domination Society Achieves a 300% Increase in Client Calls for NYC Personal Injury Lawyer August 11, 2023
  • Federal Tax Credits ERC Updates and Releases New Informational Videos about ERC July 6, 2023
  • Who is Liable for Dooring Accidents? Bronx E-bike Attorney Glenn A. Herman Explains July 4, 2023
  • Weizhen Tang Announces Publication of Law and Justice: My Struggle During His 2026 Mayoral Campaign July 4, 2023
  • Enhancing Data Compliance with AdvisorVault: Heritage Brokerage’s 17a-4 Trusted Partner July 3, 2023
  • Attorney Beau Harlan: The Champion of Justice Unveils Comprehensive Legal Services for Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR June 28, 2023
  • The Legal Process for Motor Vehicle Accidents in New York City June 2, 2023
  • NYC Bicycle Accident Lawyer Explains Winning an Accident Claim March 20, 2023

Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • July 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • December 1999
  • January 1970
New York Injury News
1512 Schorr Place
PMB #35071
Bronx, NY 10469
718-210-1007
Copyright © 2025 New York Injury News
Go to mobile version