Logo
Menu
  • Home
  • Practice Areas
    • Medical Malpractice LawHelping New York Medical Malpractice, Personal Injury Cases
    • Close
  • New York Injury News
  • Press release
    • Injury News
    • Motor Vehicle Accidents
    • Personal Injury Accidents
    • Construction Accidents
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Premises Liability
    • Product Liability
    • Work Related Fire Fighter Deaths
    • Wrongful Death
    • Close
  • Ask A Lawyer
  • Free Case Evaluation
  • Sitemap

Home » Injury News » New York City » Wal-Mart battles OSHA over $7,000 fine: Paying fine means admitting liability

Wal-Mart battles OSHA over $7,000 fine: Paying fine means admitting liability

07/07/2010 // West Palm Beach, FL, USA // Tara Monks // Tara Monks

Nassau County, NY – Even though Wal-Mart Stores has spent nearly $2 million in various community programs in Nassau County stemming from the 2008 Black Friday incident in which an employee was trampled to death by an unruly crowd, it has spent the same amount battling a $7,000 OSHA fine, according to The New York Times.

The dispute is over the premise of the fine. Wal-Mart is battling OSHA’s attempts to establish the notion that an unruly crowd is an occupational hazard that can cause death or serious injury. According to Wal-Mart spokesperson David Tovar, “The citation has far-reaching implications for the retail industry that could subject retailers to unfairly harsh penalties and restrictions on future sales promotions.”

The feud over the meager $7,000 fine stems from the death of a Wal-Mart employee in a Long Island store. Jdimytai Damour, a temporary employee of Wal-Mart, died from asphyxiation when a crowd of shoppers waiting outside the store the day after Thanksgiving trampled over him just before the doors were to open at 5 a.m. The crowd of approximately 2,000 people was lined up for hours near a handwritten sign that stated “Blitz Line Starts Here.”

The OSHA fine was the result of what OSHA labeled as Wal-Mart’s failure to provide a place of employment “free from recognized hazards.” The organization claimed the retail giant violated its “general duty” to employees by failing to take adequate steps to protect them from a situation that was “likely to cause death or serious physical harm” from “crowd surge or crowd trampling.”

Wal-Mart accuses OSHA of attempting to enforce a vague standard of protection. Wal-Mart maintains the death of Damour was an unforeseeable accident, and explains it has done many things to prevent future occurrences along these lines, including submitting to three years of monitoring from Nassau County.

The company admitted no fault though, in its agreement with Nassau County. According to a lawyer involved in a lawsuit wagered by a customer who was injured during the trampling episode, “They [Wal-Mart] don’t want to take responsibility realistically for what they did…They paid all the money to settle with the district attorney to prevent a potential indictment.”

Basically, Wal-Mart officials do not want to agree to the fine because it will recognize liability and responsiblility. If OSHA is able to establish that surging crowds are an occupational hazard, the organization will be free to inspect all store crowd-control measures to when it is planning a sale. Wal-Mart does not want OSHA taking a magnifying glass to its crowd control plans.

On Wednesday, July 7, 2010, the feud will reach some sort of head, as Wal-Mart lawyers are scheduled to contest the fine before a federal appeals commission.

Motions filed against the fine have included claims of inconsistent enforcement on OSHA’s behalf and questioning the constitutionality of using the “general duty” clause in the case. Wal-Mart has also used its bounties of funding to attempt to subpoena witnesses to explore the exact cause of Damour’s death, a move that sought to argue the cause of death as an unmanageable crowd.

Splitting hairs is easy when money is not an issue.

Media Information:

Address:
Phone: (866) 598-1315
Url: http://TaraMonks.visionsmartnews.com/wal-mart-battles-osha-over-7000-fine_1235.html

It's only fair to share...Pin on Pinterest
Pinterest
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email
Print this page
Print
July 10, 2010   vision
Injury News, New York City battle, employment attorney, fine, occupational hazard, osha, unruly crowd, wal mart stores
×

  • Middletown CT heat injury: High school football player collapses during training
  • Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill: Department of Labor gives $27M for affected workers

Recent News and Press Coverage

  • Todd Stager, Esteemed SEO for Lawyers Expert, Embarks on a New Journey with His Own SEO Firm March 11, 2024
  • Attorney Dan Powell Examines the Financial Challenges of Not Having a Living Trust: Implications for Business Owners February 16, 2024
  • Adam P. Boyd Leads Innovative Masterclass on Strategies for Law Firm Growth February 14, 2024
  • David Dardashti Donates to Expand Research on Sexual Violence Among Children and Develop Prevention Protocol. January 29, 2024
  • A Queens County Supreme Court jury rendered a verdict for $7 million In Medical Negligence Case December 1, 2023
  • Record-Breaking $700,000 Verdict by Mezrano Law Firm Redefines Justice in Personal Injury Cases November 30, 2023
  • The Law Office of Richard Roman Shum Unveils Comprehensive Guide on New York Divorce Laws October 12, 2023
  • Brooklyn Estate Planning Attorney Yana Feldman Offers Free Services for Israel-bound Volunteers October 12, 2023
  • Google Drops FAQ Rich Snippets so Custom Legal Marketing Released a Video to Help Lawyers Understand Why October 5, 2023
  • Bronx Injury Attorneys Explain How Damages Are Calculated August 22, 2023
  • ZeroRisk Cases, Inc. Utilizes Cutting-Edge Technology to Target High-Quality Plaintiffs in Talcum Powder Litigation August 15, 2023
  • ZeroRisk Cases, Inc. Unveils Advanced Website Platform and Digital Marketing Strategy for Increased Law Firm Growth August 15, 2023
  • The Search Engine Domination Society Achieves a 300% Increase in Client Calls for NYC Personal Injury Lawyer August 11, 2023
  • Federal Tax Credits ERC Updates and Releases New Informational Videos about ERC July 6, 2023
  • Who is Liable for Dooring Accidents? Bronx E-bike Attorney Glenn A. Herman Explains July 4, 2023
  • Weizhen Tang Announces Publication of Law and Justice: My Struggle During His 2026 Mayoral Campaign July 4, 2023
  • Enhancing Data Compliance with AdvisorVault: Heritage Brokerage’s 17a-4 Trusted Partner July 3, 2023
  • Attorney Beau Harlan: The Champion of Justice Unveils Comprehensive Legal Services for Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR June 28, 2023
  • The Legal Process for Motor Vehicle Accidents in New York City June 2, 2023
  • NYC Bicycle Accident Lawyer Explains Winning an Accident Claim March 20, 2023

Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • July 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • December 1999
  • January 1970
New York Injury News
1512 Schorr Place
PMB #35071
Bronx, NY 10469
718-210-1007
Copyright © 2025 New York Injury News
Go to mobile version