• Home
• About New York Injury News
• New York Lawyer Panel
• New Jersey Injury Lawyers
• Long Island Personal Injury Lawyers
• Ask A Lawyer
• News Tags

• Construction Accidents
• Injury News
• Medical Malpractice
• Motor Vehicle Accidents
• Personal Injury Accidents
• Premises Liability
• Product Liability
• Work Related Fire Fighter Deaths
• Wrongful Death

New York Premise Liability Attorney Discusses When A Municipality Is Responsible For A Negligent Driver

By Vito A. Cannavo, Esq.  - New York City Trial lawyer, Vito A. Cannavo, Esq.experienced in municipal and premise liability, educates on the issue of a jury’s determination as to whether a municipality is responsible for a negligent driver in car accident lawsuits. A victim can recover against a municipality for injuries sustained in an automobile collision if the negligent driver of the other vehicle was a municipal employee and not an independent contractor.  A recent decision holds that it is up to a jury to determine, based on all of the surrounding circumstances, the employment status of a driver in a case like this.

In Santiago v. Spinuzza, 48 A.D.3d 1257 (4^th Dept. 2008), the plaintiff was injured in a collision with an inspector for the City of Dunkirk. The City moved for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint on the grounds that the driver was not a municipal employee and was merely an independent contractor.  The trial court denied the motion, and the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, affirmed.  In support of its decision, the Appellate Division pointed out that the driver was required to work a certain number of hours per day as specified by the City, that she began work each day at City Hall and reported back to a City official at the end of each day, that she had a work space within City Hall, and that she carried a City identification card with her signature on a line labeled “employee signature.”  Based on these facts, the Appellate Division held that a jury should be allowed to decide, based on the specific circumstances surrounding the driver’s work with the City of Dunkirk, whether she was, in fact, a municipal employee.

As this case demonstrates, the specific facts of the individual case will determine whether a plaintiff can recover against a municipality after a collision.  In New York, an attorney with experience handling cases arising from car accidents will know the importance of investigating such a case thoroughly and identifying all of the evidence available to establish that the negligent driver was a municipal employee.

Related posts

• When to Obtain an Attorney After a Car Accident Explains New York City Car Accident Lawyer (0)
• New York car accident - 6 People Injured (0)
• Knowing Your Rights - The Statute of Limitations for Medical Negligence (0)
• Payment of Liens and Claims From Settlements of Lawsuits Arising From Car Accidents (0)
• Municipalities Can Be Held Liable When They Act Like Private Companies (0)
• New York Medical Malpractice Attorney Robert G. Sullivan Addresses The Importance of Colon Cancer Screening (0)
• New York Medical Malpractice Lawyer Explains Why Uterine Rupture Takes Place in Patients Electing Natural Delivery Following A Previous Cesarean Section (0)
• New York Medical Malpractice Attorney Robert Sullivan Calls Uterine Rupture the Primary Risk of Natural Delivery After Previous Cesarea (0)
• When Are Liens and Claims to Be Repaid from Car Accident Lawsuit Settlements? (0)
• New York State’s Dram Shop Act: The Seller of Alcoholic Beverages to an Intoxicated Person is Liable to a Person Injured by the Intoxicated Person (0)